Connect with us


Honest Review: Glock 44 .22 LR



Everybody Wants a .22 LR These Days …

… but not every manufacturer wants to do the work to make one great. So many companies take the easy route and license their designs to second-party manufacturers to create a .22 LR version of their flagship centerfire guns. Trouble is, these “generic” guns are often just not the same as the real-deal name brand. The other route is to create a conversion kit, and up until 2019 that’s the approach Glock took. These days, instead of Glock 22 conversion kits, shooters can buy a real, factory-produced .22 LR, named the G44, which is based directly off the Glock 19 (9mm) and 23 (.40 S&W) pistols.

But Why?

I’m too responsible to recommend this pistol for self-defense; no matter how you cut it, rimfires are too underpowered to end a criminal confrontation quickly. (That said, any pistol is better than no pistol.) Really, where the G44 shines is as a trainer. Being the same size as “the most popular pistol sold” means that it already fills a need for many. After all, .22 LR is just so cheap to shoot that you can burn through 200 or so rounds of .22 LR for the same price as one box of 9mm.


I have owned several .22 LR trainers from other companies, and my experience with them is that they tend to be scaled down about ¾, so nothing fits. Not so with the G44: Since it’s the same size as the Glock 19/23, any holster you already own that fits those profiles will work.

Another cool aspect is that the G44 uses the same rail as any other full-sized Gen 5 Glock frame. This means that you can attach the same lights and or lasers to the G44 and your larger-bore Glocks.

Even though the G44 is a single-stack pistol, the magazines of the G44 and G19/23 are the same exact outside dimensions. Therefore, while training, you can use the magazine pouches you already have. Having a similar feel is important for building muscle memory!

My Mods

This is the first trainer pistol that is a successful clone of one of my carry pistols. The G44 can use any aftermarket trigger components for Gen 5 Glock pistols. I have my G44 set up with the same Apex Tactical action enhancement kit as my G19. I am spoiled by the aluminum flat trigger with no flex. The dovetail and front sight hole is the same as the G19, so any 9mm Glock sights will fit the G44. Warning! The G44 dovetails are located on the polymer part of the side, so you need to take extra care when installing the rear sight. An oversized sight will gouge the polymer.

Where the G44 Falls Short

Out of the box, the G44 has a horrendous Glock factory trigger. The striker spring is extra heavy on purpose, because the factory wants to make sure that no matter what .22 LR you use, you will not get light primer strikes. Trust me, I understand reliability, but the trigger is a bit overkill. Dropping a few pounds with a lighter striker spring did not reduce reliability of igniting the rimfire cartridges.

The G44 is only available as a Gen 5 Glock, so if you are trying to match a previous generation Glock, you can get close but not the same. In all honesty this is the best argument for still buying an Advantage Arms conversion kit. They make conversions for all of the different sizes and generations.

Also, there’s no MOS optics cut. I have been told by Glock representatives that an optic would add mass to the slide, lowering reliability. In my opinion this is a BS answer. A Trijicon RMR adds like 1.2 oz to the slide, maybe with really low power ammo reliability would decrease. But in reality that should be my decision after reading a warning of only using higher velocity .22 LR like CCI mini-mags with an optic.

Okay, and the 1994 assault weapons ban called and they want their 10-round magazines back. Glock: What gives? You could have designed a fantastic magazine with full capacity. Glock reps told me their main goal was reliability. Don’t get me wrong; the G44 is reliable, but I do still have misfeeds with the factory magazines. Weirdly, both of my 18-round Pro-Mag magazines are more reliable maybe one misfeed in 500 vs 1-200/300 for the factory magazines.

And while I’m on the topic of missed opportunities, the G44 is an American pistol for the American market. So did Glock use the industry standard .22 LR thread pitch of 1/2×28 TPI? Nope! Someone at Glock thought it was a great idea to thread the suppressor barrel in M9 x .75 RH. I want to ask the readers, have you ever seen a suppressor threaded in that? Glock does include an adaptor but why? You are stating the tolerance of the suppressor, on top of the tolerance of the adaptor, on top of the tolerance of the barrel. Glock could have just threaded it to the industry standard where there are thousands of different suppressors to fit.

I Actually Did Like Some Things

I have swooned over the size and the fact that I could basically make a training clone of one of my carry pistols. That alone overrides most of my gripes with the pistol, especially since most can be fixed.

Many people may not know this, but the G44 slide is both steel and polymer. They do this to keep the slide’s weight down, using steel in only the critical parts. Because of this, the G44 striker is exactly like that of other Glock pistols. Unlike every other .22 LR firearm, Glock says that the G44 is safe to dry-fire. In fact, to take it apart you need to dry-fire it. Dry-fire work is important for developing and maintaining good shooting skills, so it’s nice to be able to do that without using snap caps.


It does bother me that the G44 has been around for three years and we have not had any updates or “fixes.” In that time Glock could have released a properly threaded barrel, giving people more compatibility choices. Glock could have also developed higher capacity magazines, instead they leave that up to the aftermarket.

Yes, I have critiques on this gun, but don’t think I’m saying it’s a bad gun. It isn’t at all! In fact, it is one of my favorites, especially when taking new shooters to the range. Mostly I am disappointed that with a couple more updates they could take a good pistol and make it a fantastic pistol. Nevertheless, having the option for a .22 LR pistol that offers the same quality and feel of my other Glock pistols overrides any negatives in my mind.

–James Nicholas Mr. UnPewFessional Himself!



  1. Joe Jones

    October 23, 2023 at 5:28 pm

    I own the first Glock 44 ever sent to my state of Oklahoma. I run 100 rounds through it every Monday. This I’ve been doing since the day I bought it. I’ve never had a fail to feed or any fails from any ammunition I’ve used. My favorite ammo is Aquila 40 gr. I find all performance transfer from my 44 directly to my EDC 19.

  2. Kenneth Borman

    October 24, 2023 at 11:48 am

    I find it to be a fine gun, no fails or hang ups. and very accurate despite the heavy trigger. it Is my weekend carry gun around the property. (snakes’ rats etc.) I know .22LR is a little light for self-defense but 10 + 1 fired fast and accurately (light recoil) will do the job if needed. During the week I carry a G27 .40 SW.

  3. R. Walker

    October 26, 2023 at 12:58 pm

    I think this article is not titled correctly as an “Honest Review” of the Glock 44. In fact, as I read it, very little of this article is factual and more of it is editorial in nature, that is one person’s opinion. I purchased a 44 a few years ago and think it fits the bill nicely as a .22 handgun. The price point is reasonable, the 10 round capacity is normal for the typical .22 pistol (Ruger, S&W Victory, Walther PPQ, Walther P22, SIG Mosquito) so I do not see this in and of itself as a liability.

    Sure there could always be bigger magazines, but Glock magazines work every time, and you cannot say that for every magazine out there no matter the platform. Another thing about the Glock 44 which puts it ahead of many other rimfires, it actually reliably cycles every .22 no matter the brand I have put thru it- Aguila, CCI, Remington, Federal, S&B, you name it, I am yet to experience reliability issues. For clarification, the Glock slide is partially metal with polymer inserts is probably to hold the slide mass down due to the limited blowback potential of the .22. This is further enhanced by the fluted chamber. So far as horrible Glock trigger is concerned, once again, this is purely subjective and betrays an inexperience with how to correctly use the Glock trigger and the reasoning behind it. My groups are solid and point of aim agrees with point of impact. I don’t think 5.5 lbs is heavy. So far as an EDC gun, if you don’t think .22 isn’t effective, you’ve never seen what properly placed .22 will do to a target, a lot of people talk about this like they knew, but how many have seen it with their own eyes? Trust me, CCI Stingers or Mini Mags can be quite effective. Besides, a competent shooter can empty a Glock 44 in seconds, putting 11 rounds into a target and that is going to hurt.

  4. paul I'll call you what I want/1st Amendment

    November 7, 2023 at 12:21 pm

    I bought mine because the walter pdq is a piece of crap and hard to clean! I was surprised to see that it is almost the same size as my g23 gen4. I got it so if i take someone to the range they can try an easy shooter.Bad thing is the sight tool, i lost it after the first time i used it….glock could have made it like a regular screw driver for sure! 10 rds meh… but i’m not taking it into battle so no big deal. trigger pull is important and i don’t get spoiled/lazy with a lighter one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Copyright © 2021 Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. Popular EDC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.